Test Report
Testing Scope
The scope of testing is to verify fitment to the specification from the perspective of
Functionality
Deployability
Configurability
Customizability
Verification is performed not only from the end user perspective but also from the System Integrator (SI) point of view. Hence, the Configurability and Extensibility of the software is also assessed. This ensures the readiness of software for use in multiple countries. Since MOSIP is an “API First” product platform, Verification scope required comprehensive automation testing for all the MOSIP APIs. An automation Test Rig is created for the same.
Test Approach
Persona based approach has been adopted to perform the IV&V, by simulating test scenarios that resemble a real-time implementation.
A Persona is a fictional character/user profile created to represent a user type that might use a product/or a service in a similar way. Persona based testing is a software testing technique that puts software testers in the customer's shoes, assesses their needs from the software and thereby determines use cases/scenarios that the customers will execute. The persona needs may be addressed through any of the following.
Functionality
Deployability
Configurability
Customizability
The verification methods may differ based on how the need was addressed.
For regression check, “MOSIP Test Rig” - an automation testing suite - which is indigenously designed and developed for supporting persona-based testing. MOSIP Test Rig covers the end-to-end test execution and reporting. The end-to-end functional test scenarios are written starting from pre-registration to creation of packet in registration center, processing the packet through the registration processor, generating UIN and authenticating identity using IDA through various permutation and combinations of cases being covered. MOSIP Test Rig will be an open-source artifact which can also be enhanced and used by countries to validate the SI deliveries before going live. Persona classes include both negative and positive personas. Negative persona classes include users like Bribed Registration Office, Malicious Insider etc. The needs of positive persona classes must be met, whereas the needs of negative persona classes must be effectively restricted by the software.
Verified configuration
Verification is performed on various configurations as mentioned below
Default configuration -
eSignet with 7 languages (English/Khmer/Hindi/Kannada/Tamil/Arabic/French)
Signup with 2 languages (Khmer/English)
Main feature tested:
Signup Portal with mock ID
Login with Password with mock ID
Forgot Password with mock ID
Login with OTP with mock ID
Login with biometrics with mock ID
Login with KBI with mock ID
Identity verification process (L2 flow) with mock ID
Identity verification process (L2 flow) with MOSIP ID
Signup Portal with MOSIP IDA
Login with Password with MOSIP IDA
Forgot Password with MOSIP IDA
Login with OTP with MOSIP IDA
Login with biometrics MOSIP IDA
Sunbird Plugin with MOSIP IDA
Critical and Blocker Bugs verification
Docker Compose testing for esignet, esignet-signup, esignet-mock-services (windows)
Feature Health
Test execution statistics
Functional test results
Below are the test metrics by performing functional testing using mock MDS, mock Auth and mock ABIS. The process followed was black box testing which based its test cases on the specifications of the software component under test. The functional tests were performed in combination of individual module testing as well as integration testing. Test data were prepared in line with the user stories. Expected results were monitored by examining the user interface. The coverage includes GUI testing, System testing, End-To-End flows across multiple languages and configurations. The testing cycle included simulation of multiple identity schema and respective UI schema configurations.
3183
3113
35
35
Test Rate: 98% with Pass rate: 98%
Here is the detailed breakdown:
API Based Testing - eSignet
2017
Passed
1965
Failed
17
Skipped
35
UI Based Testing
1166
Passed
1148
Failed
18
Skipped
0
API Testrig results for eSignet and Signup with Mock ID:
API Based Testrig - eSignet
1011
Passed
514
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
495
Known issues
2
API Based Testrig - eSignet-signup
661
Passed
626
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
30
Known issues
5
Note: 525 test cases related to the MOSIP ID plug-in are currently being ignored.
API Testrig results for eSignet and Signup with MOSIP - CRE:
API Based Testrig - eSignet
1011
Passed
838
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
169
Known issues
4
API Based Testrig - eSignet-signup
Total
661
Passed
400
Failed
53
Skipped
186
Ignored
17
Known issues
5
API Testrig results for eSignet and Signup with MOSIP – qa-base:
API Based Testrig - eSignet
1011
Passed
848
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
169
Known issues
4
API Based Testrig - eSignet-signup
661
Passed
643
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
17
Known issues
1
Note: 186 test cases related to the mock plug-in are currently being ignored.
API Testrig results for eSignet and Signup with Sunbird:
API Based Testrig - Sunbird
1011
Passed
93
Failed
0
Skipped
0
Ignored
918
Detailed Test metrics:
Below are the detailed test metrics by performing manual/automation testing. The project metrics are derived from Defect density, Test coverage, Test execution coverage, test tracking, and efficiency.
The various metrics that assist in test tracking and efficiency are as follows:
Passed Test Cases Coverage: It measures the percentage of passed test cases. (Number of passed tests / Total number of tests executed) x 100
Failed Test Case Coverage: It measures the percentage of all failed test cases. (Number of failed tests / Total number of test cases executed) x 100
Sonar Report:
eSigent
release-1.6.x
release-1.6.x
86
0
0
0
0%
eSignet Signup
release-1.2.x
release-1.2.x
82.1
0
0
0
0%
esignet-mock-services
release-0.11.x
Release-0.11.x
81.4
0
0
0
0%
esignet-plugins(mock-plugin)
release-1.3.x
release-1.3.x
83
0
0
0
2.9%
esignet-plugins(mosip-identity-plugin)
release-1.3.x
release-1.3.x
68.9
0
0
0
0%
esignet-plugins(sunbird-rc-plugin)
release-1.3.x
release-1.3.x
83
0
0
0
0%
Refer to the github link for more on reports here.
Last updated
Was this helpful?